Read Next

Comment: "The Last Blow to Human Hegemony"

Two great comments on "Having Your Own Ethics is Lonely." First is by Roy, thought-provoking, and also, I laughed a lot at how his final sentence wraps it all up:

Hello. Your comment to Stefanie about creating your own set of values and ethic being lonely, look pretty much like the concept of the Ubermensch from Nietzsche. So I'll say that anyone following this path is on the right path to the next level of human development. And I'll go farther on this. I think that Nietzche closed the loop on human nature. Copernicus discovered that we were not the center of the world which was a blow to human hegemony. Then came Darwin stating that human was not special and we are just another can of animal. This was a second blow on human hegemony. Then came Freud stating that human is not even the master of his thoughts and impulses. Which was yet just another blow to human hegemony. And to finalize it all. Here comes Nietzche stating that there is not a single system of ethics that bind us all. No human system and certainly not heavenly system of ethic stands. Which to me is the last blow on human hegemony.

Have a nice day.

Then Ryan replies -

I disagree somewhat with Roy's comment. Humans are special, what separates us from other animals is the ability to reason. Its true that we posess animal instincts like all creatures on this planet, and so by nature, man is corrupt. I believe there are ethics that bind all people, like the persute of being happy through the possession of freedom, wich requires discipline over ones own actions, wich requires some form of ethical standards. Just because you think it, does not mean you must do it. If you have no disapline, you become a slave to others, like too much debt for instance, you feel the shame of failure when the bill arrives. But do you work to solve it, or make it worse? The point is that we all fail some time or another, but its how you deal with your failures that can make you a good or bad person.

Estimating like an Adult - What to Steal from Agile...

On Imported Blog

In Part 1, we talked about the primary problems with estimating software development accurately:

But we ended with the uplifting message, which is if you plan for the former (by multiplying out your estimates), and make sure you adequately track the latter, then your estimates - when taken in aggregate - will probably be ok. And by ok, I mean better than 90% of other developers.

But who wants to be a 10 percenter, when you can be a 1 percenter?

I also promised Agile was going to solve all your problems ever when it came to estimating. This may not have been 100% accurate. What we are going to do is look at a whole bunch of Good Ideas(TM) that the Agile folk stole, curated, and invented when it comes to estimation.

It turns out that we humans get a little weird about time. However much you believe "six hours" is "just an estimate", however much buy-in there is from the team about this, and however many times you've accepted that there's always hidden complexity, if a six hour task takes eighteen hours, everyone gets a little squirrely.

Rendering New Theme...