A few of my friends – three friends, to be exact – mentioned to me that I write a heck of a lot on here and they’re impressed. I have convinced the ultra-smart Sami Baqai to start blogging, and he just got the holy-shit-this-is-hard-I’m-overwhelmed feeling. Ah, yes, I have been there Sami. Perhaps I can share some thoughts.
First and foremost, I am a huge devotee of the Equal-Odds Rule. As far as I know, I’m the only person talking about it outside of academia. This Amazon review covers it pretty well:
The equal-odds rule says that the average publication of any particular scientist does not have any statistically different chance of having more of an impact than any other scientist’s average publication. In other words, those scientists who create publications with the most impact, also create publications with the least impact, and when great publications that make a huge impact are created, it is just a result of “trying” enough times. This is an indication that chance plays a larger role in scientific creativity than previously theorized.
So I read that, and I’m like – whoa. You know Neo in the Matrix? Whoa.
If you want to make excellent stuff, you need to make a lot of stuff.
If you want to make a lot of stuff, you’ll make a lot of crap.
If you want to make excellent stuff, you need to make a lot of crap.
And my personal opinion here -
And that’s okay, because you get judged by your best work, not your bad work.
At the risk of being honest, a lot of my writing here is crap. I mean, it’s okay, it’s not totally stupid, but a lot of it is very “meh” – well, by own estimation. But occasionally I really nail something, and that’s what people are going to remember. A Lot of Victory is Just Walking Around turned out to be a huge hit and got hundreds of visitors from people Facebook-liking it, when I just typed it up on the spur of the moment. I thought it was good, but nothing crazy revolutionary – I was talking about noticing where business are in certain areas, and what businesses are missing that you could potentially build. I talked about putting a premium mechanic shop in an upscale district of Hong Kong I was walking around, or opening a coffee chain in Cambodia. People loved that, I got so many compliments and lots of new visitors, many of whom stuck around and are still readers. (Hi guys! Glad you stuck around) In retrospect, I guess yeah that was a good post. But it only happened because I wrote some very just-okay posts too.
Alright, but let’s talk nuts and bolts more. Three things we’ve already covered this post -
1. I believe in the Equal-Odds Rule, which states roughly that a creator can’t entirely control the quality of their output. In order to do high impact excellent work, you have to do a lot of work, which includes low impact not excellent work.
2. I think as long as you’re not doing life-or-death stuff, it’s okay to put out low quality work. Well, not really. I’m kind of a perfectionist. What I actually mean is you’re going to be a bad judge of how good your own stuff is, especially if it’s creative work. Don’t put out anything wrong or terrible or lazy, but if something is okay and you gave it your best, put it out. People might like it, or might not, but you probably won’t be able to know in advance.
3. You’ll get judged by your best work. I’ve written up at least 150 articles over the last four months. If I want to present my writing to someone, I’ll link to the best 10-20 and get evaluated on those. If I’m pitching something really important, I can always go edit and polish an even better version.
This is big stuff. This is the mental side of it. I happen to know how good Sami’s writing is, because he and I swap emails and share ideas. We connected originally from Hacker News, and he’s a super-sharp guy, very multi-disciplinary bright. But Sami obviously got some issues putting crap out into the world. He doesn’t want do it. Well, Sami, you want to do great work or not? You’re going to have to put some crap out to do great work. I know, it’s hard. It sucks. Mind you, I don’t want to put crap out. It’s just, that’s the Equal-Odds Rule, which I am a believer in.
Alright, nuts and bolts for real this time.
4. I commit to doing it every day, every single day no matter what.
5. My audience is whoever likes it – the site is written for me. If someone doesn’t like it at this point in their life, they’re not my audience for now.
6. Extensive notes/backlog – quotes, stories, pictures, ideas. Lots of this.
7. I accepted that I’m going to judged. I don’t love it, but I accepted it. It comes with the territory.
8. Look at my first entries if you want to be inspired. Or any blogger’s first entries. Or Seth Godin’s “E-Marketing” book from 1995. Sort of cheesy – “MORE THAN $1,000 WORTH OF MONEY-SAVING COUPONS INSIDE” – but it doesn’t seem to have derailed his career. Just the opposite, actually – we all gotta start somewhere.
A few tactical thoughts:
9. Post scheduling is good, especially if not going to be near internet. You can schedule when a post comes live pretty easily on any modern blogging platform. I don’t like to do this too far in advance, because I want my currently published things to be whatever I want to talk about on the phone with people or in email since people do bring it up. But I often write a post before sleeping, and schedule it to go live a minute after midnight. That way, I’m not under time crush the next day to make sure I get a blog post in. If I want to write more, I’ll write a second post that day. If I’m not sure about internet because I’m flying, I’ll schedule two in a row, one for the next day, one for the day after, but I don’t even do that too often. I like my writing to be whatever is on my mind.
10. Not worrying about perfection, just starting. (See the ugly links on here? ?p=193 or whatever? I hate them. It’s okay though, eventually I’ll figure out how to change them without breaking all my earlier posts)
11. Try to think of every visitor as an honored guest. If you think of “web traffic,” 15 visitors is disappointing. If you think of 15 people deciding to spend time with you they could spend anywhere, and they’re choosing to spend it with you – they’re choosing to spend their life energy reading your thoughts – that’s very cool and humbling, and suddenly chugging along with 15 readers feels pretty good. I had between 10 and 40 visitors for the longest time. The site is starting to blow up a little bit more, had 746 unique visitors on September 1st and have been above 200 daily visitors consistently recently, but I was pretty honored even when 10 people were stopping by for 4 minutes each. That’s 40 minutes of life energy people are choosing to spend with you instead of somewhere else. Like, that’s pretty humbling. Now I have 200 regular readers? Like, whoa. That’s 800 minutes per day. People are spending 12 hours of life-time each day with me. Wow. That’s cool. Even when it was 10 per day, I was thinking that was really cool and humbling.
12. On a very busy day, I’ll just post a quote or a short insightful thought. I’ve got some quotes from Miyamoto Musashi, Tokugawa Ieyasu, Marcus Aurellius, Thomas Jefferson, Sun Tzu, Carl von Clauswitz, and others lined up.
“The strong manly ones in life are those who understand the meaning of the word patience. Patience means restraining one’s inclinations. There are seven emotions: joy, anger, anxiety, adoration, grief, fear, and hate, and if a man does not give way to these he can be called patient. I am not as strong as I might be, but I have long known and practiced patience. And if my descendants wish to be as I am, they must study patience.” – Tokugawa Ieyasu
(well, I just fired one of my emergency blog post bullets. Ah well, it is a good quote)
13. Listen to audio at cafes with nothing else to do. Sit there, have coffee, listen to smart audio. Ideas will come. Jot down a note.
14. When you have a good idea, write it down. I have a “shorttermblog.txt” on the desktop of my laptop, and there’s at least dozens of ideas written down in there. Sometime or other I’ll talk about Roman Emperor Septimus Severus made a huge mistake making his two sons Caracella and Geta joint-Emperors. Dude, Septimus, that never works…
15. Have fun. I mean, really have fun. Look at my “Some General Life Goals” – “carrying self like rich dickhead” is on the list. After I already took a screenshot of my computer, I realized that was on there. I thought about censoring it. Nahh, whatever. Someone could judge me? Yes. Someone could get offended? Yes. I just wrote up another post, “Arguing With Peasants Shows a Lack of Self-Discipline” – I thought to myself, “Do I really want to write that?” Am I going to get asked on some news interview sometime, “So, you think you shouldn’t argue with peasants, do you?” in a really sanctimonious, judging tone that makes me look bad? I don’t know, maybe. Probably? Whatever. It’s actually how I think. I read some insight from economist Vilfredo Pareto about how the peasants never actually take control of the government, instead one elite uses the peasants to kill off the other elite, but the peasants themselves never take power. Reading that, a lot of things clicked. I said, “Ohhh, I shouldn’t argue with peasants who believe they can really take power.” A lot of peasants are backing their team – well, have fun in your new worker’s paradise Socialist Soviet Republic. Idiots. Will I catch flak later because I shared my honest opinion about this? Maybe. But whatever, it’s how I think. This is a relatively new feeling for me, in the past I always tried to be diplomatic, and now I’m more and more just saying what I’m actually thinking. It’s actually enjoyable in its own strange way.
16. That leads me to the final point, which is you gotta remember this is all a circus. Life is really a circus. Are you such a big deal that you can’t be embarrassed, or make a mistake, or do something wrong? No, you’re not. You’re not a big deal. At least, I’m not a big deal. I’ll say some stupid shit at some point, and get embarrassed, and look bad. Oh well. If things break the right way, I’ll also found branches of science, inspire people, build amazing businesses, found charities that actually work, make art, fund art, fund science, build a virtuous international dynasty, and all sorts of other stuff. But if I try and fail? Well, whatever, I’m not such a big deal. I can be embarrassed. It’s okay if I get something wrong or say something stupid. Most of what we obsess over is going to turn to dust anyways.
My favorite poem: Ozymandius by Percy Bysshe Shelley
I met a traveller from an antique land
Who said: Two vast and trunkless legs of stone
Stand in the desert. Near them, on the sand,
Half sunk, a shattered visage lies, whose frown
And wrinkled lip, and sneer of cold command
Tell that its sculptor well those passions read
Which yet survive, stamped on these lifeless things,
The hand that mocked them and the heart that fed.
And on the pedestal these words appear:
“My name is Ozymandias, king of kings:
Look on my works, ye Mighty, and despair!”
Nothing beside remains. Round the decay
Of that colossal wreck, boundless and bare
The lone and level sands stretch far away.
This is all coming down, man. Turning to dust. Life’s a circus.
Now, some people have this attitude of, “Well, all this doesn’t matter, so I’m just going to party, or do nothing, or whatever.” Me? No way! I think, “Well, most of this doesn’t matter, so I might as well found branches of science, do great works, build amazing things, make art, write, fund things, build things, fix things, serve people, and otherwise do amazing stuff.”
I mean, why not, right?
On the tactical level, I’d strongly recommend committing to writing every day. Every single day, something. Even something small. People liked “Sun Tzu says – Make It Look Easy” and that was just a short quote I picked up listening to the Art of War.
Look at my early posts, if you like. A lot of them aren’t very good. But you start doing it every day, every single day, and you get better pretty quickly. You start noticing what people like, and tweaking your works, and it’ll come. Just accept that your early work is going to suck, and even later some of your work is going to suck, and cherish every visitor. I’ll add you to my RSS reader and I’ll stop by from time to time, so there, you’ve got at least one visitor. Do it every day, eh? You’ll suck and make crap for a while, and then you’ll do good stuff, and in not-very-long you’ll do some awesome stuff. Tone is hard to get, but it comes with time. Every single day is the way. Something, even just a quote. You’ll find the theme later. Now, get started, eh?
Favor request from Sebastian: Does the bold in the post help you read or get in the way? The post came out to 2200 words, so I went back and bolded for skimming. Helpful or harmful? Your opinion will affect how I format future posts – please let me know in the comments, and thanks for the feedback.
Edit: Oh, the irony. Not my best post by any stretch of imagination, but it becomes my first to hit the front page of Hacker News. Discussion on HN is here.



{ 55 comments… read them below or add one }
← Previous Comments
The bold is helpful, but a bit all over the place. I’d much prefer if you bolded the first sentence of every point, or marked them more clearly by other means. As several points run multiple paragraphs, skimming to the next small number is hard.
Thanks Evgenij – yeah, I agree with you. I added the bold after I’d already written and tried to bold the most important ideas, but it is pretty haphazard. I’ll think a little bit about formating before I start next time, and try to get some consistency in there. Thanks for the feedback, much appreciated.
As I was reading I looked for exceptions to your rule and thought of Paul Graham and Steve Blank. All of their posts are good. The problem is they’re both not a counter example. They’ve both been writing about, thinking about, and expressing their thoughts on their subjects for a long time. Practice and experience have put them in a position where it appears they only put out high quality content because they’ve already built the experience and do their editing before release. So they’re both an example of your model. Anyway, that may be helpful to someone who wishes to object.
Now on point (16), when I was some years younger and still a surly youth I was quite bothered by this idea that there was no point to it all and it took some time to realize that this sort of fatalism (sadly you seem better read than me, I do not know if fatalism is a… hmm, turns out I’m a compatible determinist) goes both ways. If one believes nothing matters that doesn’t suggest one’s life is meaningless but that one’s life is of neutral value. I wish more kids knew this idea. http://xkcd.com/167/
Hey Benjamin,
Thanks for the great comment.
> As I was reading I looked for exceptions to your rule and thought of Paul Graham and Steve Blank. All of their posts are good. The problem is they’re both not a counter example. They’ve both been writing about, thinking about, and expressing their thoughts on their subjects for a long time. Practice and experience have put them in a position where it appears they only put out high quality content because they’ve already built the experience and do their editing before release. So they’re both an example of your model. Anyway, that may be helpful to someone who wishes to object.
Great point, yeah. I’m a huge fan of Paul Graham’s writings. I’ve said before and I’ll say it again – I think he goes down as the most important philosopher of our era. Who else is even close? “What You Can’t Say” is just amazing – http://www.paulgraham.com/say.html
I also seem to remember Paul commenting that he completely writes a number of essays, but then scraps the ones he doesn’t think are particularly amazing. Now, that does mean his signal:noise ratio is incredibly high, and any piece from him is going to get people excited. At the same time, I bet even his scrapped essays are pretty good, and I’d like to read them. So in some ways, that’s kind of a shame that those don’t get out into the world, though I understand why he does it. And yeah, he’s got lots of experience and practice, so he can make that judgment call, and you can definitely see the refinement of his style and writing over time. Good point there.
> Now on point (16), when I was some years younger and still a surly youth I was quite bothered by this idea that there was no point to it all and it took some time to realize that this sort of fatalism (sadly you seem better read than me, I do not know if fatalism is a… hmm, turns out I’m a compatible determinist) goes both ways. If one believes nothing matters that doesn’t suggest one’s life is meaningless but that one’s life is of neutral value. I wish more kids knew this idea. http://xkcd.com/167/
I’m so anti-fatalist it’s not even funny. Everyone I know who believes that they’re in control of their and everything is up to them tends to thrive, and everyone who believes that they’re not in control of their life tends to fail. There seems to be a pretty clear cause and effect relationship here: believe you’re in control of your life and everything is your responsibility and you wind up excelling. Believe you’re not in control of your life and some of it isn’t your responsibility and live in mediocrity or worse. That’s before getting into physics arguments or philosophy arguments, which I don’t think are so important. I see the clear relationship between feeling in control of your life and excelling.
That comic is so funny and spot-on. Thanks for the very good comment.
14. When you have a good idea, write it down. I have a “shorttermblog.txt” on the desktop of my laptop, and there’s at least dozens of ideas written down in there. Sometime or other I’ll talk about Roman Emperor Septimus Severus made a huge mistake making his two sons Caracella and Geta joint-Emperors. Dude, Septimus, that never works…
Have you thought about using Devonthink Pro or a similar program? I use it as Steven Berlin Johnson describes here, and it’s fantastically useful: quotes from books, ideas, past blog posts, and the like are all in one place and intelligently searchable.
In my own writing, for example, this post on Pamela Druckerman’s Lust in Translation is probably far stronger than it would be otherwise thanks in part to using DTP, which helped me find that connection to Thy Neighbor’s Wife and to The History Man.
To be sure, the program doesn’t substitute for thought or for writing every day, but it can augment the minds of those who are already doing things right. But I used to have a disorganized text file much like yours, and now I have that file in the context of a lot of the rest of my writing, which is a big improvement.
Hey Jake, thanks for commenting.
> Have you thought about using Devonthink Pro or a similar program? I use it as Steven Berlin Johnson describes here, and it’s fantastically useful: quotes from books, ideas, past blog posts, and the like are all in one place and intelligently searchable.
I just went to check out Devonthink Pro, but it’s Mac-only and I’m running Windows 7 on a Toshiba. Looks good, though. I do use some organizing software – online I use a few of Google’s products, I use MyLifeOrganized to keep my notes, to-do, calendar, and daily time tracking straight, and then I’m pretty low tech beyond that: Folders, .txt’s, and other files mostly. I clean the folders up once a week and file everything. I might try something like Devothink though, it seems like it’d help especially in researching… hmm, just read that Steven Johnson post, and yeah it looks useful for the kinds of things I do. I’ll try to find a Windows version and learn it sooner or later, thanks for that recommendation.
> In my own writing, for example, this post on Pamela Druckerman’s Lust in Translation is probably far stronger than it would be otherwise thanks in part to using DTP, which helped me find that connection to Thy Neighbor’s Wife and to The History Man.
Hey, there’s some good stuff on your site, thanks for showing me that. Added you to my RSS, actually I’ll shoot you an email in a moment as well. Thanks for the comment – I always appreciate good tools recommendations and the opportunity to connect with people doing cool stuff. Cheers.
I think this is your second — I remember reading about your tipping experiences :)
Thanks for this: It’s honest, charming and timely (for me).
P.S Bold works for me.
> Thanks for this: It’s honest, charming and timely (for me).
Thank you! People massively underestimate how cool it is for a person to get appreciated on their creative work. Maybe later in life I’ll have to harden my heart and be a little more stubborn, but in the meantime positive comments and emails make me smile a lot, cheers for that :)
> P.S Bold works for me.
Duly noted! Thanks for the feedback there.
You just published my “secret” (that I actually tell everyone). I write upwards of 10 times a day and people wonder how on earth I do it. Like you say, they only remember the quality stuff. If you just produce junk, it won’t work out, but truly hard workers will make it work. We both share the same philosohpy and I appreciate your articulation of it.
> You just published my “secret” (that I actually tell everyone). I write upwards of 10 times a day and people wonder how on earth I do it. Like you say, they only remember the quality stuff.
This is actually massively cool. I could probably post 3-4 times a day, but do people get RSS-fatigue and feel overwhelmed? That’s my worry. Maybe I’ll go through a bombarding phase of posting a lot more sometime. It sounds like fun. I mean, people wonder how to get high creative output – it’s very easy. Shift your entertainment time into doing creative stuff. I promise that writing and responding to comments and emails from smart people is a hell of a lot more entertaining than whatever’s on TV…
> Like you say, they only remember the quality stuff. If you just produce junk, it won’t work out, but truly hard workers will make it work. We both share the same philosohpy and I appreciate your articulation of it.
Cheers! Thanks for the nice comment, full agreement from me. Massive respect on posting upwards of 10x/day… I might try to scale up at some point. Thanks for the inspiration there.
This is a good post. It’s all about volume. Sales, writing, coding, whatever… A lot of people don’t realize that.
I completely disagree with Evgenij and believe the way you have broken up this post and bolded important pieces is perfect. Do not adjust your methods. :)
> I completely disagree with Evgenij and believe the way you have broken up this post and bolded important pieces is perfect. Do not adjust your methods.
Thanks for the feedback Paul, I think I’m getting a good idea in my mind of what would help people read.
I think you’ve both got good points – like you said, bold the important pieces and break it up. That lets people who want to skim catch all the important themes, and if you want to refer back to something after finishing reading it’s fast.
Evgenij has a point too though – the structure is kind of haphazard. I can keep bolding just the important going forwards and still make it more clean – I just need to do a little more planning on structure in advance. I think you’re both right – bold the important parts, but make it a little cleaner too. Thanks for the feedback Paul, very valuable for me to hear what suits people. Cheers and best wishes.
> “See the ugly links on here? ?p=193 or whatever? I hate them. It’s okay though, eventually I’ll figure out how to change them without breaking all my earlier posts …”
I don’t know which version of WordPress you’re using, but even versions as early as 2.2 has this thing called Permalinks (look under Options or Settings). The best thing about it is that it won’t break your existing ?p=nnn format (i.e., http://www.sebastianmarshall.com/?p=195 and http://www.sebastianmarshall.com/how-do-i-write-so-much will refer to the same post).
Thanks for the feedback Rizal.
> I don’t know which version of WordPress you’re using,
The newest one. 4.1 I think.
> but even versions as early as 2.2 has this thing called Permalinks (look under Options or Settings). The best thing about it is that it won’t break your existing ?p=nnn format (i.e., http://www.sebastianmarshall.com/?p=195 and http://www.sebastianmarshall.com/how-do-i-write-so-much will refer to the same post).
I tried changing it to /%postname%/ but then things broke, especially Google results. Ideally I’d like to be able to fill in a custom slug every time I write a post, have it as a field on the “Add New” screen. I’ve been looking for a plugin that does that, I figure there must be one but I haven’t found it yet and I’ve tried a couple things. Still, I’ll play it with more going forwards. Thanks for the comment and guidance.
I feel like the real sweet spot is somewhere between the advice you give, Sebastian, of adding a new post every day, and the Paul Graham example that the first commenter (Jake) provides.
Whenever I strive to do something every day, it ends up feeling forced or contrived, and inevitably the quality drops. (I might be atypical in that regard?) Furthermore, I think there is such a thing as wearing down your audience. It’s like you’re lowering your own value – not by decreasing the signal strength, but instead by increasing the amount of noise.
That said, I agree with you that we should all make it a goal to write every day. I started blogging earlier this year, and only at that point did I realize how difficult it is. So, taking my first point into account – my suggestion is that you do write every day, but not necessarily share everything you write. By doing so, I think you still develop your voice and style, without obligating yourself to add to your blog every day. This approach has helped me avoid burnout.
Thanks for sharing this post. (Bold greatly increases readability for me, even if I’m not just skimming.)
Hey Karl, your whole comment was really good. I think this part summed it up best:
> So, taking my first point into account – my suggestion is that you do write every day, but not necessarily share everything you write. By doing so, I think you still develop your voice and style, without obligating yourself to add to your blog every day. This approach has helped me avoid burnout.
I agree with that, yeah. Well, depends on where someone is at in their development. A lot of people need to publish to just get over their fear of rejection/perfectionism/self-importance. But if you’re already producing at a high level, you could scrap and only put out the highest quality and get a reputation for that.
For what it’s worth, I think forcing yourself to write even when not in the mood does produce worse work that day, but makes you a better writer (or producer of anything, really). But I dunno, maybe I’m off on this – it comes down to everyone’s own style, strategy, and where they’re at in their development. For someone who isn’t going full steam, I’d say write every single day. Also, this might just be me, but I find “every single day” is more manageable than “three times a week” because it becomes part of my life every single day. It’s not, “Oh, do I have to write today?” I write every day. So, that’s good for me, but I could see changing it up over time to suit your style and development too. Thanks for the comment, good stuff.
My blog is ostensibly about programming. There was this phase when I tried to post something every single day, and I ended up writing about cars quite often (which is my second interest, and the subject offers lots more to write about).
My priorities have since changed and I blog very rarely nowadays. Surprisingly, the number of visitors hasn’t tapered off much – most of them are coming from google searches, and amongst my most popular past posts are the quick copy-and-paste ones.
One of the reasons I ceased focusing on my blog is the time it takes me to come up with a post – never less than an hour, and sometimes up to three hours. I’m under the impression that people like patio11 can write very eruditely, very fast. So I guess people write at different speeds, and I think this is a big factor that affects how often one is able to blog.
> One of the reasons I ceased focusing on my blog is the time it takes me to come up with a post – never less than an hour, and sometimes up to three hours. I’m under the impression that people like patio11 can write very eruditely, very fast. So I guess people write at different speeds, and I think this is a big factor that affects how often one is able to blog.
This strikes me as a learnable ability, no? I bet there’s a format, style, or process you could use to consistently turn out decent work in 20 minutes with practice? I’m a huge believer that anyone who can get excellent at pretty much any positive sum game. Writing is a positive sum game, I wonder if there’s a win/win way for you to produce something good in a short-ish period of time? Might require a style/format change but seems to me like it could be possible.
I didn’t even notice the bold, so I don’t know if that’s good or bad. Maybe I’m going blind. This post was timely for me too. I’ve spent most of the day holding back, moaning that anything I write will be crap because I don’t have any “good” ideas in my head. I eventually started writing, but it took me too long to remember that the only way I’d write anything good is if I actually *wrote*.
I love Ozymandius. I wanted to recite it for a drama exam when I was at school but my teacher wouldn’t let me. She said it was too childish.
> I didn’t even notice the bold, so I don’t know if that’s good or bad. Maybe I’m going blind. This post was timely for me too. I’ve spent most of the day holding back, moaning that anything I write will be crap because I don’t have any “good” ideas in my head. I eventually started writing, but it took me too long to remember that the only way I’d write anything good is if I actually *wrote*.
For sure. You can look at some of my original posts if you like – stuff like “buy groceries when traveling” – nothing particularly amazing. Was just putting words on paper. The inspiration comes later if you keep doing it.
> I love Ozymandius. I wanted to recite it for a drama exam when I was at school but my teacher wouldn’t let me. She said it was too childish.
Ridiculous. This is why she’s a teacher instead of a successful poet or dramatist or whatever she really wanted to be before flaming out at it and becoming a teacher. A good teacher would nurture what you want, there can be greatness in anything, and Ozymandias is a fantastic poem on a deep theme about the transience of physical things. But most teachers don’t really want to be teachers, they fail at whatever their chosen discipline is and fall back on educating. Which is kind of scary and depressing, actually.
Honestly… this was a fabulous post. It inspired me. Thanks for writing it. The humor was great…… and while one day, Jobs… Gates…. or Gore will stand as the virtual Ozmandius of the internet….. this grain of sand definitely had meaning.
I am a new blogger and I find this article is very inspiring. especially:
1. I believe in the Equal-Odds Rule, which states roughly that a creator can’t entirely control the quality of their output. In order to do high impact excellent work, you have to do a lot of work, which includes low impact not excellent work.
Like your blog post. I am trying to write regularly and your post is a bit inspiring. My new blog will be at http://blog.stevemorin.com I hope you read more of your stuff in the future.
> Like your blog post. I am trying to write regularly and your post is a bit inspiring. My new blog will be at http://blog.stevemorin.com I hope you read more of your stuff in the future.
This is great. The key, again, is to just start. Anything. I’ll keep an eye on your new site – Entrepreneur, Startup Advisor and Adventurer – yes, that’s the kind of mix that I’d like to read on.
> PS I think the highlighting is actually helpful when it’s done the right way. I think you did a pretty good job with it.
Cool, noted. Cheers and godspeed, looking forward to much good stuff on blog.stevemorin.com.
PS I think the highlighting is actually helpful when it’s done the right way. I think you did a pretty good job with it.
Thanks, Sebastian. Actually, you’re describing just what I’ve done, but after my last blog-post (that I in retrospect hated), it was real good the hear your thoughts on allowing crappy work in order for the good stuff to bubble up. Yes, I believe it’s partly a numbers game.
Best regards,
Sten
RE: #10 (fixing ugly links): To help you satisfy your perfectionism (and my curiosity), I looked up getting permalinks to work in WordPress, tried it out, and I’m glad to report that it’s really easy to fix (at least for the first time you set it up; it becomes a bit more complicated if you want to change your permalinks configuration).
Via http://codex.wordpress.org/Using_Permalinks:
Go to your WP Admin -> Settings -> Permalinks. Choose a Common Setting (“Day and name” or “Month and name” would probably do the trick), or pick a custom one.
If your .htaccess is writable to WP, it’ll automagically set it up for you. If not, it’ll show you what to add after you Save.
Profit!
Any requests to the old “?p=X” URIs will get redirected (301 Moved Permanently) to the new location.
Your server will need some sort of URL rewriting capability, e.g. mod_rewrite in Apache. I can probably help you out if you have any questions/issues — at least with WordPress; I’m not a therapist ;-)
Have a great day,
Remoun
Very, very good points, and a bit of inspiration I needed. Thank you! In fact, I just tweeted “My new motto … “If you want to make excellent stuff, you need to make a lot of stuff.” http://twitter.com/maguay/status/23063537756 :)
I personally use Backpack from 37signals to keep all of my ideas together. It’s great for lists, and the free version covers my needs ok. Tada list (free from 37signals too) is another option, but I like the way you can add more info in Backpack. Between that and Evernote, that’s basically where all my blog ideas are. I’d be in bad trouble if they both disappeared overnight! I really wish there was something similar to Backpack pages I could install directly on my own server, but sadly I’ve never found anything…
As for RSS overload … I recently decided to largely reduce the amount of RSS I read, and haven’t used Google Reader very much lately. I find I’m getting a much better experience from Twitter, Hacker News (which is how I found your site!), and Techmeme, so that’s my current mix. That will be different for everyone, though, I was just overloaded and spending way too much time on RSS, so scanning top Twitter/HN stuff seems to give me more value for time.
Thanks again for the inspirational post! Blog on!
> Thank you! In fact, I just tweeted “My new motto … “If you want to make excellent stuff, you need to make a lot of stuff.” http://twitter.com/maguay/status/23063537756
Very cool! By the way, I haven’t really gotten into Twitter yet. Got some thoughts for me? I’m http://twitter.com/sebastmarsh – I’d like to make this a part of workflow and communications, but it hasn’t caught on for me yet. Got any thoughts, Matthew?
> I personally use Backpack from 37signals to keep all of my ideas together. It’s great for lists, and the free version covers my needs ok. Tada list (free from 37signals too) is another option, but I like the way you can add more info in Backpack. Between that and Evernote, that’s basically where all my blog ideas are. I’d be in bad trouble if they both disappeared overnight! I really wish there was something similar to Backpack pages I could install directly on my own server, but sadly I’ve never found anything…
I like MyLifeOrganized because I’m offline sometimes, but 37S does make incredibly usable stuff. I’ve thought about getting a high powered CRM/CMS hybrid system built up, I’ll probably do that later when I have far too much cash sitting around. It’d be nice to see all the communications I’ve had with people and all my notes/resources in a single place, but there’s no great cheap solution for this yet that I’ve found either.
> As for RSS overload … I recently decided to largely reduce the amount of RSS I read, and haven’t used Google Reader very much lately. I find I’m getting a much better experience from Twitter, Hacker News (which is how I found your site!), and Techmeme, so that’s my current mix. That will be different for everyone, though, I was just overloaded and spending way too much time on RSS, so scanning top Twitter/HN stuff seems to give me more value for time.
Good stuff. I like Techmeme, I found it not too long ago and it’s very solid. I’m actually new to RSS and I love it, I wish I’d gotten it on years ago. I can go through it very fast for info on a wide range of topics, and can go deep into one site quickly if I like. I love it, but then, I haven’t gotten into Twitter yet so maybe that’s a replacement if I get it down. Hacker News is one of my favorite sites, too, probably I spend more time online there than anywhere else.
> Thanks again for the inspirational post! Blog on!
Cheers! Thanks for the good comment :)
Thanks for bringing back some memories with Ozymandias – love that poem, and hadn’t seen it in 23 years.
>For sure. You can look at some of my original posts if you like – stuff like “buy groceries when traveling” – nothing particularly amazing. Was just putting words on paper. The inspiration comes later if you keep doing it.
Thanks. I hadn’t had a chance to look at your older posts this weekend, but I will now.
>Ridiculous. This is why she’s a teacher instead of a successful poet or dramatist or whatever she really wanted to be before flaming out at it and becoming a teacher. A good teacher would nurture what you want, there can be greatness in anything, and Ozymandias is a fantastic poem on a deep theme about the transience of physical things. But most teachers don’t really want to be teachers, they fail at whatever their chosen discipline is and fall back on educating. Which is kind of scary and depressing, actually.
Ha! This makes me feel better about it. I never could get why she didn’t see the poem’s message about hubris, yet I could. Despite the fact I must be half her age.
I completely agree that to produce great work, there is, unfortunately, going to be some crap along the way. I think your post goes a long way in boosting confidence of those like myself who are writing their first posts. Thank you.
> I completely agree that to produce great work, there is, unfortunately, going to be some crap along the way. I think your post goes a long way in boosting confidence of those like myself who are writing their first posts. Thank you.
Awesomeness, glad it helps. You’re a designer, eh? There’s so much for pieces on good design, beauty, things like that. Literally an infinite space, making the world more beautiful and functional. I think people who are experts often underestimate how cool their knowledge is. You could say, “See this logo? I like the color, font, and size of it.” Very short post with a copy of a logo. But that’d be very cool for someone like me who knows nothing about logos. Things like that – might seem trivial and simple to you, but can be awesome and insightful for readers. Best wishes, and thanks for the nice comment.
I would add: write about stuff that matters to you. Maybe it is obvious. But there is something about the whole “write an idea a day” thing that has to do with things you want to think but it’s difficult to, ideas that you want to form but forming them just requires an enormous amount of effort…
> I would add: write about stuff that matters to you. Maybe it is obvious. But there is something about the whole “write an idea a day” thing that has to do with things you want to think but it’s difficult to, ideas that you want to form but forming them just requires an enormous amount of effort…
Indeed! Writing on stuff you care about is much easier and more thrilling and gets you juiced more than stuff you don’t. How could I forget to put that down? Duh! Thanks for the comment, yes, very good advice!
@Sebastian – Twitter definately just grew on me … it seemed pointless to me at first, but now I like it. The key is to follow people who post stuff you really like, unfollow stuff you don’t, and @reply people to build community. Lists can be a great way to organize Twitterers into topics, and then just check the list to see what’s going on in that topic.
And unfortunately, in the CRM world, great != free :( I’ve not hit the perfect solution yet either, and 37signals stuff gets rather pricey on pro accounts if you’re a freelancer. But it does work great; no problems there! Backpack is an especially unique product, and I just use the pages for a rich to-do list with extra info about each thing (notes, links, etc.). If only Evernote made nicer lists….
> @Sebastian – Twitter definately just grew on me … it seemed pointless to me at first, but now I like it. The key is to follow people who post stuff you really like, unfollow stuff you don’t, and @reply people to build community. Lists can be a great way to organize Twitterers into topics, and then just check the list to see what’s going on in that topic.
Yeah, I guess there’s no trick, just gotta build slowly, eh? I see the value in Twitter if you were having good @reply discussions, but getting set up on that seems to be a chicken and egg problem. I’ll put some time into it at some point, it seems cool.
> And unfortunately, in the CRM world, great != free
I think in the next 2-5 years it will. Seems to be a pretty good thing to loss-lead in order to get great data from a good demographic. There’ll be an ultra-powerful, free-ish CRM available in 5 years, 10 at most. I don’t even that’s a bold prediction really.
> I’ve not hit the perfect solution yet either, and 37signals stuff gets rather pricey on pro accounts if you’re a freelancer. But it does work great; no problems there! Backpack is an especially unique product, and I just use the pages for a rich to-do list with extra info about each thing (notes, links, etc.). If only Evernote made nicer lists….
I keep hearing Evernote. I gotta get on there. Thanks for the recommendations, especially about Twitter. I’ll give it some time later.
I would like to take issue with the “Equal-Odds Rule”.
It seems to be forgetting the role of the audience in liking your work. Some things might succeed because they resonate with the zeitgeist, the now…
It’s not that your work is crap or excellent. It can be competently or incompetently written – spelling, grammar, and good sentence construction etc. But the value judgement of good or bad is not an absolute.
Now of course the more you write the more likely it is that you will chime with the current interest and if you are write from the gut you could be in touch something not easily formed in your waking consciouness. Writing like that enables things to grow as you write.
I just don’t think it is not as random as the rules implies. Experience and wide-ranging reading, listening, talking and communicating probably put a writer in touch with what the audience wants to hear. It’s not just your volume of writing that predicts some success and some failure.
Thanks for writing your piece. I do really need to get off my critical butt and start writing more. I do aim for perfection. I should aim for doing. Thanks for that.
Nick – I think that’s a really insightful comment and a good point. I don’t have much to add – I agree with you, and thanks for contributing – the point about resonating with the zeitgeist is particularly insightful. For the rest – yes, write more! And come let us know! You’ve obviously got some talent with the mind and you write well. I’ll tune in if you write :)
Best wishes.
Actually… I am itching to edit what I wrote earlier – too hasty. I just see too many klunky things in it. Cringes.
Thanks for the encouragement.
> Actually… I am itching to edit what I wrote earlier – too hasty. I just see too many klunky things in it. Cringes.
Feel free to re-write it? I say damn perfectionism, but if it’s a big deal I can edit in the new version for you in place of the old one.
> Thanks for the encouragement.
I wasn’t just flattering you, what are you waiting for? Seriously? We ain’t getting any younger…
I’m a big fan of the bold. Even though I read the whole post the bold ‘wakes me up’ while I’m reading and gets me to refocus.
> I’m a big fan of the bold. Even though I read the whole post the bold ‘wakes me up’ while I’m reading and gets me to refocus.
Thanks for the feedback. Looks like bold is winning by a landslide, I’ll keep it up. Cheers.
Just tripped over a link and landed here. HERE? I settled into a your post like a warm cup of cider and on Day 7, I say, “It is good.”
Fucking keep putting your stuff out there.
Now, pardon me, I am going to dig into the rest of this blog.
> Just tripped over a link and landed here. HERE? I settled into a your post like a warm cup of cider and on Day 7, I say, “It is good.”
Awesome. This was just so awesome.
> Fucking keep putting your stuff out there.
That’s the plan, my man. Glad you’re digging it.
> Now, pardon me, I am going to dig into the rest of this blog.
Feel free to comment on any page, even older ones. I read ‘em all, and reply to most of ‘em.
And I have no idea how I cut and pasted a link (not even my twitter page lol) into this box. My bad.
I think your post was actually a sweet beginning to a potential series of blog posts about this topic. Most writers pretend to comprehend what they’re talking about when it comes to this stuff and most of the time, very few people actually get it. You seem to really dominate it though, so I think you should take it and run. Thank you!
I was was doing research and suprised by the info you have. Found exactly what I needed also. Please write more.
I loved this post. I used to have a personal blog that I wrote only for me and was surprised that so many people enjoyed it. But then life got ‘serious’ and all about ‘personal branding’ and I stopped that blog in favour of having a professional blog… which I struggle to pay attention to.
Thanks for writing this, I’m going to change my approach because of it.
Namaste!
Thanks for the kind words, Justine. I really, really believe that creative people get judged by their best work, and people pretty much ignore the rest. That means more output = better results. I try to write a lot, and if 1/10 is a winner, or even 1/20, that’s not so bad. New visitors will get exposed to a growing amount of really good posts over time, even if only 5% of my writing hits a really good standard that I’d like. Also, the more you do, the better you get.
Namaste, thanks for commenting!
Great post. I’m inspired. Keep up the good work.
Thanks heeps man. Equal odds fits in with my new Napoleon Hill esc thought patterns: What the mind can conceive and believe, the mind can achieve!
Not a bad post. Little too much information in here for casual consumption, good thing I read fast and retain a fair bit of it.
Yes, the bold helps, but since the question was asked over a year ago, no worries.
And I have to say that I am particularly fond of the Equal Odds Rule – at least half of what you write will be below average, but the rest will be better than that, some of it might even be good. < Priceless. And as for offending some of the people? Well, let's just say that some will always want to be offended. That's their problem, not yours (or mine, or whatever).
Human nature is to reject and combat that which is different than our own, (thoughts, opinions, feelings) and it takes an advanced thinker to be aware of such traits in self and address/change them.
Good luck in your adventures, I've got more than a year of posts to catch up on. Good stuff here.
Dan.
{ 28 trackbacks }