What’s the mental burden of trying to do something? What’s it cost? What price are you going to pay if you try to do something out in the world?
I think that by figuring out what the usual costs to doing things are, we can reduce the costs and otherwise structure our lives so that it’s easier to reach our goals.
When I sat down to identify cognitive costs, I found seven. There might be more. Let’s get started -
Activation Energy – As covered in more detail in this post, starting an activity seems to take a larger of willpower and other resources than keeping going with it. Required activation energy can be adjusted over time – making something into a routine lowers the activation energy to do it. Things like having poorly defined next steps increases activation energy required to get started. This is a major hurdle for a lot of people in a lot of disciplines – just getting started.
Opportunity cost – We’re all familiar with general opportunity cost. When you’re doing one thing, you’re not doing something else. You have limited time. But there also seems to be a cognitive cost to this – a natural second guessing of choices by taking one path and not another. This is the sort of thing covered by Barry Schwartz in his Paradox of Choice work (there’s some faulty thought/omissions in PoC, but it’s overall valuable). It’s also why basically every significant military work ever has said you don’t want to put the enemy in a position where their only way out is through you – Sun Tzu argued always leaving a way for the enemy to escape, which splits their focus and options. Hernan Cortes famously burned the boats behind him. When you’re doing something, your mind is subtly aware and bothered by the other things you’re not doing. This is a significant cost.
Inertia – Eliezer Yudkowskoy wrote that humans are “Adaptation-Executers, not Fitness-Maximizers.” He was speaking in terms of large scale evolution, but this is also true of our day to day affairs. Whatever personal adaptations and routines we’ve gotten into, we tend to perpetuate. Usually people do not break these routines unless a drastic event happens. Very few people self-scrutinize and do drastic things without an external event happening.
The difference between activation energy and inertia is that you can want to do something, but be having a hard time getting started – that’s activation energy. Whereas inertia suggests you’ll keep doing what you’ve been doing, and largely turn your mind off. Breaking out of inertia takes serious energy and tends to make people uncomfortable. They usually only do it if something else makes them more uncomfortable (or, very rarely, when they get incredibly inspired).
Ego/willpower depletion – The Wikipedia article on ego depletion is pretty good. Basically, a lot of recent research shows that by doing something that takes significant willpower your “battery” of willpower gets drained some, and it becomes harder to do other high-will-required tasks. From Wikipedia: ” In an illustrative experiment on ego depletion, participants who controlled themselves by trying not to laugh while watching a comedian did worse on a later task that required self-control compared to participants who did not have to control their laughter while watching the video.” I’d strongly recommend you do some reading on this topic if you haven’t – Roy Baumeister has written some excellent papers on it. The pattern holds pretty firm – when someone resists, say, eating a snack they want, it makes it harder for them to focus and persist doing rote work later.
Neurosis/fear/etc – Almost all humans are naturally more risk averse than gain-inclined. This seems to have been selected for evolutionarily. We also tend to become afraid far in excess of what we should for certain kinds of activities – especially ones that risk social embarrassment.
I never realized how strong these forces were until I tried to break free of them – whenever I got a strong negative reaction from someone to my writing, it made it considerably harder to write pieces that I thought would be popular later. Basic things like writing titles that would make a post spread, or polishing the first paragraph and last sentence – it’s like my mind was weighing on the “con” side of pro/con that it would generate criticism, and it was… frightening’s not quite the right word, but something like that.
Some tasks can be legitimately said to be “neurosis-inducing” – that means, you start getting more neurotic when you ponder and start doing them. Things that are almost guaranteed to generate criticism or risk rejection frequently do this. Anything that risks compromising a person’s self image can be neurosis inducing too.
Altering of hormonal balance – A far too frequently ignored cost. A lot of activities will change your hormonal balance for the better or worse. Entering into conflict-like situations can and does increase adrenalin and cortisol and other stress hormones. Then you face adrenalin withdrawal and crash later. Of course, we basically are biochemistry, so significant changing of hormonal balance affects a lot of our body – immune system, respiration, digestion, etc. A lot of people are aware of this kind of peripherally, but there hasn’t been much discussion about the hormonal-altering costs of a lot of activities.
Maintenance costs from the idea re-emerging in your thoughts – Another under-appreciated cognitive cost is maintenance costs in your thoughts from an idea recurring, especially when the full cycle isn’t complete. In Getting Things Done, David Allen talks about how “open loops” are “anything that’s not where it’s supposed to be.” These re-emerge in our thoughts periodically, often at inopportune times, consuming thought and energy. That’s fine if the topic is exceedingly pleasant, but if it’s not, it can wear you out. Completing an activity seems to reduce the maintenance cost (though not completely). An example would be not having filled your taxes out yet – it emerges in your thoughts at random times, derailing other thought. And it’s usually not pleasant.
Taking on any project, initiative, business, or change can generate these maintenance costs from thoughts re-emerging.
Conclusion
I identified these seven as the mental/cognitive costs to trying to do something -
*Activation Energy
*Opportunity cost
*Inertia
*Ego/willpower depletion
*Neurosis/fear/etc
*Altering of hormonal balance
*Maintenance costs from the idea re-emerging in your thoughts
I think we can reduce some of these costs by planning our tasks, work lives, social lives, and environment intelligently. Others of them it’s good to just be aware of so we know when we start to drag or are having a hard time.
Thoughts on other costs, or ways to reduce these are very welcome.


{ 29 comments… read them below or add one }
I think that walkstation (treadmill + standing desk) could reduce the effect of stress hormones, and make it easier to “go on” ;) I think that the feeling of continuously going forward will project into the actual work as well. It is definitely something that I want to experiment with.
I’d be curious to try that out someday – if I ever come across a coworking space with that setup, I’d try it out for a bit for sure.
Regarding the last point i.e. “Maintenance costs from the idea re-emerging in your thoughts”, I find this has a positive aspect to it when thinking about ideas, projects, blog-posts or anything on your todolist. If an idea for a blog post or new web project keeps popping up in my head, I take that as a signal that I should do some work towards it.
It’s quite common to get excited about an idea and then lose motivation for it half way through. To filter the bad ideas out I try to sit on them for a few days, weeks, months or however long to see if they pop up again before I put any resources towards them.
Yeah, me too for a lot of projects, but other projects (especially ones with tough deadlines) the maintenance costs can be undesirable… it is really good with certain kinds of projects, though. Good comment.
conflicts underly many of your listed costs. reduce conflict and you reduce costs to all kinds of activities.
Agreed. Good comment Calvin.
Good stuff Sebastian.
Your blog is the only one I read anymore from among numerous blogs concerning productivity, alternative lifestyles, and philosophy. Yours manages to stay relevant discussing topics which seem pertinent to my daily life such as this post which offered me an explanation as to why I was dragging so badly today – willpower depletion from having forced myself to alter a bad habit of mine (laughing or smiling at random triggers) today. Anyways, it helps just to be aware of the source of my weakness so I don’t lose to much motivation attributing it to deeper character flaws.
Again, congrats on the high quality posts.
Thanks Evan, that’s really cool of you to say. And ego depletion is important, yeah – I’m all for doing as much as possible, but sometimes knowing when you’re hitting the wall is important too.
I’d been reading about will power depletion lately and found this interesting as it’s the first time I’ve come across an attempt to concisely list the numerous factors that affect productivity.
Thanks for the summary. It seems like a good sort of theoretical or abstract basis, for a lot of the practical stuff you advocate on your site, e.g. overcoming bad inertia by long term habit change, reducing activation costs of good habits through routine and daily planning, stabilising hormonal risks through diet and exercise etc.
I’d be really interested to read more if you end up developing this further.
> I’d been reading about will power depletion lately and found this interesting as it’s the first time I’ve come across an attempt to concisely list the numerous factors that affect productivity.
Yeah, it’s funny how a lot of times, there’s a lot of knowledge out there but no one’s really cataloged/unified it… there’s always lots of low hanging fruit in emerging disciplines. Maybe someone else has done this too though – I’d be curious to see their work if so. It’s potentially really valuable stuff.
> I’d be really interested to read more if you end up developing this further.
Yeah, it’s something I’m working on. I’m doing it largely to scratch my own itch – because I want to reduce, manage, or just outright pay the costs to do massively a lot of things. I’ll keep you and everyone updated, of course :)
Brilliant post. Thank you.
It’s interesting how fear can become a self-fulfilling prophecy. In a creative or unfamiliar endeavor. That constant worry of “I suck, I suck, I suck” takes up valuable attention that could be used in the performance of the task. In essence, people can worry about choking so much that they choke.
The mind is a terrible thing sometimes.
My personal solution to this is pay specific attention to something not related to what I’m afraid of. For example, writing longhand and worrying more about my handwriting than the quality of what I’m writing.
I wrote an essay that was picked up by Lifehacker that talked about it. Check it out if you have a minute. http://patrickemclean.com/podcast/a-defense-of-writing-longhand-2/
Thanks Patrick, good points. Read your post on writing longhand – good stuff there, thanks for sharing it. Cheers.
Interesting. Is there any empirical research to support your ideas or is your list of cognitive costs solely derived from introspection? Just curious…
A bit of both. I’ve done lots of reading on the topic and I think there’s decent supporting evidence on all of the points, but I haven’t seen a catalog like this anywhere yet. There could well be more costs I didn’t cover, and any individual point I made might be incomplete or a little off base. I think overall it’s a pretty sound list, though, and can be used as a jumping off point for people curious to explore the topic more.
Hello. Great article. How did you break free from Neurosis/fear? Ideas, suggestions? Thanks.
Well thought out, good work. Willpower depletion is somewhat scary – maybe we really can’t “have it all”? Conversely is there a way to recharge willpower?
Eating. Your brain needs fuel. I don´t have the reference at hand.
Brain Willpower Depleted By Use
http://www.futurepundit.com/archives/005116.html
but this one contradicts the previous one
Brain’s willpower not fueled by glucose
http://www.futurity.org/science-technology/brains-willpower-not-fueled-by-glucose/
Interesting, interesting, interesting… hmm, it seems intuitive to me that eating and sleeping could recharge willpower to some extent. Good links, thanks Axel.
Hi Sebastian,
“Neurosis/fear/etc – Almost all humans are naturally more risk averse than gain-inclined. This seems to have been selected for evolutionarily. We also tend to become afraid far in excess of what we should for certain kinds of activities – especially ones that risk social embarrassment.”
This really hit me. I never thought of it as neurosis but that’s what it really is. I think I’ve made it a life goal to want to minimize this feeling as much as possible. It’s such a huge challenge for me that it’s something that’s worthy to challenge and overcome everyday.
It’s a daily battle because neurosis (especially in the social realm) is like a rubber band. Every time you do something neurosis inducing, it stretches out a metaphorical rubber band out more. That symbolizes how “flexible” you are with this neurosis. It’s like momentum. When you continue to do it, you have more leeway with novel experiences. (It’s not as neurosis inducing after the 10th risky situation in the same day for example.)
However, the rubber band bends back the moment you stop having those neurosis experiences, so it’s a never-ending challenge.
Of course, people have metaphorical rubber bands that range in many sizes (their ability to resist neurosis naturally).
So in summary: if you’re someone with high sensitivity to neurosis like situations, then it’s just a matter of tons of exposure to expand the “rubber band”.
Your thoughts?
Cheers,
Matt
Good points, fully reply here -
http://www.sebastianmarshall.com/beating-scary-things-is-like-stretching-out-a-rubber-band
Hi Sebastian,
I’d be interested to learn what faulty thought/omissions you’ve recognized in PoC.
Alex
Schwartz’s analysis rests on people who are untrained feeling overwhelmed, but neglects that many choices are very good for someone who understands the tradeoffs. I’d feel overwhelmed trying to pick 3 good spices out of 80, and Schwartz argues that voluntary simplicity would make my life better. But limiting a chef’s choice of spices would seriously hinder that chef.
Hi, there is no confirmation when we post a comment or it is not working now, it is confusing. Thanks.
Testing, testing, testing 1 2 3…
Seems to be working okay for me in Google Chrome.
Thanks Sebastian, yes it works but I posted a comment with two links and returned to this page with no notice and it did not show. I assumed it was in moderation but I did not see any notice of that.
Also related on how to start, writing in this case:
http://www.scottberkun.com/essays/54-writing-hacks-part-1-starting/
Good post. Maybe this belongs to another post, but I would add transaction costs for work that involves a team. This would include communication overhead (e.g. me not being specific enough or my team member misunderstanding me), information gap (e.g. I don’t know if my team member has completed his task so I have to constantly check up on him), and dead time on a production line (e.g. I have to wait for my partner to finish his task before I can do something).
{ 6 trackbacks }